Hane hat geschrieben:Es soll auch eine spezielle Munition verwendet werden. Stimmt das?
ja, weil die von den Glocks nimmer passt
Hane hat geschrieben:Es soll auch eine spezielle Munition verwendet werden. Stimmt das?
Robiwan hat geschrieben:Mich wundert dass nicht erwähnt wurde, dass der Lauf für die Streigenwagen-Edition extra gekürzt werden musste um in den bereits vorhandenen Waffenkoffer zu passen
Pistol bullets consistently penetrate the most.
Shotgun is next.
And the 5.56 NATO/.223 Rem penetrates the LEAST.
First up is this older article by R.K. Taubert, a retired FBI agent with over 20 years experience who conducted extensive counter-terrorism and weapons research while with the Bureau.
To quote Mr Taubert, (emphasis mine) ” … As a result of renewed law enforcement interest in the .223 round and in the newer weapons systems developed around it, the FBI recently subjected several various .223 caliber projectiles to 13 different ballistic tests and compared their performance to that of SMG-fired hollow point pistol bullets in 9mm, 10mm, and .40 S&W calibers.
“Bottom Line: In every test, with the exception of soft body armor, which none of the SMG fired rounds defeated, the .223 penetrated less on average than any of the pistol bullets.”
http://www.olyarms.com/index.php?option ... view&id=14
——-
And again on this page, there is testing by Gunsite Training Center Staff which found in a comparison of handgun calibers (9mm, .40 S&W, .22 LR, .45 ACP), and rifle caliber .223 (5.56) that:
“The only calibers which did NOT exit the “house” were .223 (5.56) soft point and hollow point loaded bullets.”
——-
Then there are the “Box O’ Truth” tests with great pictures where they found, “… Common pistol rounds easily penetrated all 4 walls spaced out at room distances … The 12 gauge shotgun went through 4 walls like they were not there … The 5.56 rounds deviated greatly from the original flight path once they started tumbling. This occurred after the second wall.”
——-
And this drywall testing concluded, “Moving away from rifle rounds takes us from fascinating discoveries into the realm of mythbusting. Handgun rounds, for instance, may penetrate less than rifle rounds–but only if the rifle rounds in question are full-power ball ammo. The relatively slow speed and heavy weight of handgun bullets make them a poor choice for limiting interior wall penetration, which is why professional door-kicker types have abandoned pistol-caliber submachineguns in favor of .223 carbines.”
http://how-i-did-it.org/drywall/results.html
——-
And this interesting test at outdoorub found “The pistol rounds were seemingly unaffected by the drywall and/or wood barriers. There was no observable deviation or fragmentation of the 9mm projectiles. You’d be safe counting on a pistol round to keep going, and going, and going … Even though the .223 rounds start with a lot more energy, they tend to lose it quickly when encountering the barriers in this test … Moral of the story? Don’t trust the mainstream media. Those high-powered, so called “assault weapons” may be safer than your average pistol for inside-the-home defense.”
BigBen hat geschrieben:Robiwan hat geschrieben:Mich wundert dass nicht erwähnt wurde, dass der Lauf für die Streigenwagen-Edition extra gekürzt werden musste um in den bereits vorhandenen Waffenkoffer zu passen
Klingt wirtschaftlich sinnvoller als für jedes Auto neue Koffer/Waffentresore anzuschaffen und verbauen lassen zu müssen.
Revierler hat geschrieben:Wo hast denn das Geschichtl her?
Man ist ja fast versucht, Fake News zu schreien.
Revierler hat geschrieben:Nein, das geht nicht. Überleg mal: Ein Pferd hat keine Daumen. Wie soll es den Sicherungsschieber bedienen? Pferde bekommen daher wahrscheinlich nur Glocks.